When developing Android applications that require high-performance computing, developers often turn to native code using the Android NDK (Native Development Kit). Two primary build systems are used in this context: NDK-Build and CMake. While both serve the purpose of compiling native code, they differ significantly in terms of performance, flexibility, and ease of use.
What Are CMake and NDK-Build?
The Android NDK allows developers to write parts of their apps in native languages like C and C++. This can be particularly useful for performance-critical tasks such as game engines or signal processing . Both CMake and NDK-Build are tools that help compile this native code into binaries that run on Android devices.
-
NDK-Build: This is a Makefile-based system provided by the NDK itself. It uses
Android.mkandApplication.mkfiles to define how your native code should be built . -
CMake: A cross-platform build system that provides more flexibility and supports modern C++ features. It uses
CMakeLists.txtfiles to define the build process and is integrated directly into Android Studio .
Performance Comparison
When it comes to performance, several factors come into play:
Compilation Speed
One of the key advantages of CMake over NDK-Build is its compilation speed. Developers have reported faster build times when using CMake, especially in larger projects with complex dependencies . This is partly due to CMake’s ability to better manage incremental builds and parallelize tasks.
Optimization Capabilities
Both systems allow for optimization through compiler flags and settings, but CMake offers more granular control over these options. With CMake, you can easily specify different optimization levels (-O1, -O2, -Ofast) and target specific CPU architectures, which can lead to better runtime performance .
Build Configuration Management
Managing multiple build configurations (e.g., debug vs release) is generally easier with CMake, thanks to its modular approach and support for variables and conditionals within CMakeLists.txt. In contrast, managing similar setups with NDK-Build requires more manual editing of Android.mk and Application.mk files, which can become cumbersome as projects grow in complexity .
Integration with Android Studio
Since Google has been pushing towards CMake as the preferred method for integrating native code into Android Studio projects, tooling support is stronger for CMake. For instance, creating a new project with C++ support automatically sets up the necessary CMake configuration under the cpp directory, making it straightforward to get started .
When Should You Use Each?
-
Use NDK-Build if you’re working on legacy projects where switching to CMake would involve significant refactoring efforts or if you need compatibility with older versions of the NDK.
-
Use CMake for new projects or when you want to take advantage of modern C++ features, better integration with Android Studio, and potentially improved performance during both development and execution phases .
Conclusion
Choosing between CMake and NDK-Build depends largely on your project requirements and existing infrastructure. If you’re starting fresh and looking for better performance and maintainability, CMake is likely the better choice. However, if you’re maintaining an older codebase that already uses NDK-Build extensively, sticking with what works might be the most pragmatic option.
Ultimately, understanding the strengths and limitations of each build system will empower Android developers to make informed decisions tailored to their specific needs.
